Русский
EnglishYouTube channel audit: Vlad Kariev – from public data
This is the audit when the creator hasn't connected stats. Everything below comes from public YouTube data: each key conclusion says where it comes from and what can't be seen. Blocks that need YouTube Studio are locked.
Summary: three decisions for the first month
What to do first, why exactly this, and how to tell a month later whether it worked – given that stats aren't connected.
Test the topic lineup
9 Central Asia episodes have a 233K median; 5 on Russia, Ukraine and Belarus 63K. But the Russia and Ukraine episodes are newer on average – they had less time to gather views.
Test the packaging
7 of 9 thumbnails with text repeat the title's words. CTR isn't visible without stats – this is about form, not clicks.
Drop the mixer from the first line and run one sponsorship
The first description line advertises a crypto mixer; under the Zelensky episode viewers call it a "crypto scam". Almost no outside brands.
What already works
Since June – long episodes about rulers: a 216K median vs 69K for 20-minute episodes about countries. Format and topic changed at the same time.
Weekly since July, no gap longer than two weeks.
Episodes open with a scene and a date ("The night of October 26, 2024… shots ring out") – the first-line check found no issues.
more views per episode than subscribers. It looks like the channel lives on recommendations – traffic sources will confirm once connected.
likes per view and 0.76% comments – viewers argue under every episode.
3 of 4 episodes pin a question to viewers: "Should I cover Turkmenistan's new president?"
Key issue
Recent episodes left the topic behind the channel's hits
9 episodes on Central Asia: a 233K median. 5 episodes on Russia, Ukraine and Belarus: 63K – 3.7x less. The exception is Zelensky (327K). The two newest episodes are still gaining.
Hypothesis: viewers come for Asia's closed countries. Test it on three of the next four episodes.
Going back to 20-minute episodes
Long episodes get 3x more. Format and topic changed together, but rolling back is an unnecessary risk.
Judging the newest episodes now
Medvedev is 6 days old, Pashinyan 13 – both still gaining. Compare on day 7.
Changing everything at once
If topics, packaging and ads all change in one month, you can't tell what worked. Start with the three decisions above.
What sponsorships can earn
Sponsorship price estimate
Ad at minutes 3–5
Captions show the first ad at minutes 3–5. Only Studio can show how many viewers leave there.
A mixer in the first line
A crypto-mixer ad in the first line and the pinned comment. Under the Zelensky episode viewers call it a "crypto scam" – viewers point it out in comments.
Affiliates only
About 11 links per description – own and partner ones. Almost no outside brands.
No erid found in 28 descriptions
That's all descriptions can show: they can't reveal every integration in the episodes or its legal status. Check with a lawyer what needs marking.
Visas and residency
Viewers from Central Asia and the diaspora – a visa link is already in the description.
History courses and books
An audience for long documentaries – books, lectures, subscriptions.
Finance for relocants
Banks, cards and transfers for viewers across the former USSR.
Travel
Episodes about countries – tours and tickets there.
Leaving money on the table? Where your content could earn more
Two ways: sponsored integrations and affiliate links. An estimate from public data; the amounts are scenarios under the stated assumptions, not proven income. Only you can see what current ads and affiliates bring.
A crypto mixer in the first line may put off big advertisersHypothesis
The first description line and pinned comments advertise the BitCleaner crypto mixer and affiliates; viewers call it a "crypto scam". One integration at market rate is ≈475K RUB (216K median × 2.2 RUB) and an episode comes out every Saturday: 4 × 475K ≈ 1.9M RUB. Episodes already carry ads (at minutes 3–5), so only you can see the gap with current income. This is a risk for selling integrations; it doesn't stop affiliate links in other videos. To check: replace the mixer with neutral partners and count brand requests over 2 months.
Brands have nothing to go onObservation
No media kit, no published rate card, demographics not confirmed. Brands find it easier to pick a channel that has them. A Bloggers.tools media kit takes a few minutes: channel stats fill in automatically, prices come from the calculator above, and brands see it on the ad marketplace.
Create a media kit ↗Advertisers post offers on the marketplace; you pick the ones that fit and apply.
- Paid as a fixed fee per integration or a share of sales (CPA)
- Turn on "Sell ads through Bloggers.tools" in your media kit so brands see your rates and formats
- Brands check your channel stats in the media kit – no screenshots needed
Commission scenario for one on-topic linkScenario on assumptions
In 17 of 28 descriptions the first ~150 characters are partner ads; links on the episode's topic sit lower. What current affiliates bring isn't visible in public data – the scenario doesn't mean they earn nothing. Math: 4 episodes × 216K views × clicks 0.05 / 0.2 / 0.5% × purchases 0.5 / 1.5 / 3% × $85 order × 8% × 70 / 85 / 95% approved = ≈$10 / 150 / 840. Audience geography is unknown without Studio, and the country changes the order value and the rate.
Which description links already workNext step
Split the links into three groups: active affiliate links to products; own projects (Telegram, website); dead links. Income from each is in the affiliate dashboards – a new link should be compared with them, not with zero.
Episodes about countries and rulers. Lifetime views are not current traffic: how much a video gets now will show in Studio data for the last 28 days. Categories are hypotheses from the title and topic. Political topic – some brands avoid such videos, check the program terms.
Categories to check: history books, history courses, learning subscriptions.
Categories to check: Central Asia trips: eSIMs, flights, insurance; history books.
Categories to check: history books, online courses, trips: eSIMs and flights.
The marketplace has pay-per-sale (CPA) offers: stores, services and single products. Pick an offer that fits the video's topic and place the link where people actually click.
- Old videos – a link in the description and pinned comment: you can't add an ad read to a published video
- Next episode – pick the offer before filming, so the product is on screen, not only in the description
- Before linking, check the terms: is the product covered by the commission, is social traffic allowed, are deep links to products allowed
- No affiliate network account – make a link to a store or product in CPAHunter, our affiliate link service (≈50K stores)
What took off and what flopped
"x" shows how many times an episode beat the channel's long-episode median (216K).
Top episodes
How did Turkmenistan become like this? Saparmurat Niyazov606,869 viewslong-episode median – 216K2.80x
Kazakhstan: how Nazarbayev lost everything451,809 viewslong-episode median – 216K2.09x
Why did Tajikistan become like this? Emomali Rahmon403,397 viewslong-episode median – 216K1.86x
Ukraine: how Zelensky lost everything326,746 viewslong-episode median – 216K1.51x
Xi Jinping: the last emperor318,090 viewslong-episode median – 216K1.47x
Azerbaijan. The Aliyev clan305,776 viewslong-episode median – 216K1.41xWeak episodes
Dmitry Medvedev. How a straight-A student turned…29,708 viewslong-episode median – 216K0.14x
Armenia. Nikol Pashinyan. The journalist who made it38,106 viewslong-episode median – 216K0.18x
Why did Gorbachev really betray the USSR?47,957 viewslong-episode median – 216K0.22x
Is Lukashenko the best president in history?62,868 viewslong-episode median – 216K0.29x
Why Yanukovych was Ukraine's worst president67,145 viewslong-episode median – 216K0.31xLast 12 episodes
What unlocks once stats are connected
Without access the AI sees only public numbers. These questions about Vlad's channel stay open – connecting takes a minute and no password.
Thumbnails: strong image, text repeats the title
The channel's last 10 thumbnails and 10 niche hits. Ours show views (CTR unlocks with stats).
Your thumbnails · views
Peers' hits · views
A ruler in the center
A recognizable face, a flag, a rich scene – the thumbnails stand out in the feed. A strength.
Text repeats the title
7 of 9 thumbnails with text use the title's words: "WHY GORBACHEV BETRAYED THE USSR?" under "Why did Gorbachev really betray the USSR?".
Too many words
7 of 9 carry 4–6 words – the feed shows 3.
A crowded scene
Peers use one face and one idea; yours add flags, fire and crowds. On a phone the details blur.
| Title | Thumbnail text | What's wrong |
|---|---|---|
| Why did Gorbachev really betray the USSR? | WHY GORBACHEV BETRAYED THE USSR? | A full repeat |
| XI JINPING: The Last Emperor. How Will He Ruin China? | HOW WILL HE RUIN CHINA? | Repeat and 5 words |
| KYRGYZSTAN. Sadyr Japarov. How a Prisoner Became President and Seized Power? Gold, GKNB and Tashiev | KYRGYZ CONVICT ROBBED THE PEOPLE | 100 characters – search shows half |
| ARMENIA. Nikol Pashinyan. The journalist who made it (or not) | AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH | A good pair – the episode is 13 days old – compare on day 7 |
The Bloggers.tools AI makes 3 thumbnail options for your next episode modeled on niche hits. Run them in Test & Compare.
Episode metadata: what works and what search misses
Tags are filled in
26–40 tags on almost every episode (one has none).
Hashtags and timestamps
Hashtags in all 28 descriptions; 18–31 timestamps on long episodes, every 3–4 minutes, and 5–9 on 20-minute ones.
First line about the episode – in 3 of 28
Search shows the first ~150 characters. In 17 descriptions that's partner ads (the BitCleaner mixer, CONTINENTAL, Finzy, Bitpapa, a lookup bot), in 8 – a link to an older episode.
Long titles
7 of the last 10 exceed 60 characters, the longest is 100. Search cuts the end, but on this channel long titles get more views so far – shorten only through a test.
Every Word Capitalized
"How a Prisoner Became President and Seized Power?" – half the titles look like this. The data shows no effect on views – not urgent.
Promise vs content
Under the Pashinyan episode viewers write: "the author says he doesn't know if he's a savior or a traitor – why that title?"
The Bloggers.tools AI rewrites the title, description, tags and timestamps: the first lines describe the episode, and the title comes in variants to test.
Descriptions – about 2,900 characters
10–14 links in each of 28 descriptions, usually 3 hashtags.
Timestamps – in 28 of 28
Long episodes usually have 22–23 chapters, 20-minute ones 8.
Formula and topic are mixed
"Why" shows up more in episodes on Russia, Ukraine and Turkey, "How" on Central Asia. Test a formula within one topic.
60 characters is a search rule
A long title gets cut in search. But on this channel long titles get more views so far – so test it, don't change them all.
Which topics carry the channel
Median "x" by topic group for long episodes. The dashed line is the channel median (1x).
Long vs short episodes
Median views by month
What to film next
Ideas from comments and topics that already took off for niche peers.
Serdar Berdymukhamedov
Pinned under the Turkmenistan episode: "Cover the new president?". On a peer channel – 27x the usual.
Gulnara Karimova
A follow-up to the Uzbekistan hit (289K) – family, trial, billions.
The Nazarbayevs after 2022
"How Nazarbayev lost everything" got 452K. A follow-up on the family.
Roman Abramovich
A direct viewer request under the Medvedev episode.
Mongolia, Iran, Venezuela
Closed countries and rulers – the same "how it became like this" format.
Comparing Asia's dictatorships
A peer's "Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan – dictatorships" got 19x the usual.
Shorts on national economies
A peer's economy Shorts reach up to 3.4M.
The most popular car in…
Your best Short – 91K, 13x the usual. A series: "the most … in every country".
Channel model: which formats work in the niche
Peers have million-view hits both in long films and in 9–25-minute explainers. Keep the core – the rest are options for later, one at a time.
On Lukashenko – 7.2M, 83 min
NEXTA, varlamov, Alexander Shtefanov
Your format: you run 60–80 minutes with a 216K median.
On Turkmenistan's dictator – 4.1M, 20 min
Slozhny Protsent, Easy History, MixShow
Your 20-minute episodes were about countries. A ruler at this length is a hypothesis to test after month one.
On Tajikistan's billionaire dictator – 3.5M, 9 min
TONY TUT, AleX BROK, 24 Kanal
A cut-down version of a long episode – an option for later.
A Coca-Cola Short – 3.4M
Slozhny Protsent
Your Shorts cover the same ground, usually 6.8K.
Shorts: daily, but about something else
48 Shorts almost daily: geography and economics trivia. A typical Short gets 6.8K, the best 91K. Their topics barely overlap with the long episodes about rulers.
- After month one: cut Shorts from long episodes – 30–40 seconds with the strongest fact
- Link the full episode in the pinned comment
- Keep the "most … in every country" series – it performs best
- Check whether Shorts bring viewers to long episodes – unlocks with stats
Comments: viewers argue, the creator doesn't reply
Praise
The storytelling and the closed-country topics: "Nobody ever covers Turkmenistan".
Criticism
The "crypto scam" ad, the sound in the Armenia episode, a title that promises more than the author says.
Requests
Turkmenistan's new president, Abramovich, more countries.
Niche peers
These topics take off for peers: AleX BROK's episodes on Rahmon and Nazarbayev got 108–244x his channel's usual level (4.1K). An idea to test on your own channel, not a forecast.
| Channel | Episode | Views | When |
|---|---|---|---|
| AleX BROK | Tajikistan: how Emomali Rahmon and his family… | 1,000,000 | – |
| Slozhny Protsent | The craziest dictator in the world – why everyone flees Turkmenistan | 4,075,679 | 2 yr |
| TONY TUT | How a Tajik billionaire dictator ruined his country | 3,482,067 | 3 yr |
| Easy History | Who started the war in Tajikistan and why? | 3,046,738 | 1 yr |
| Alexander Shtefanov | The life and suffering of Mr Lukashenko | 2,034,191 | 2 mo |
Production: what not to change in month one
A long episode every Saturday since August: 5 in August, 4 each in September and October. Summer had 3- and 2-week gaps. Shorts almost daily.
Keep one episode a week. Only three things change: the topic lineup, a packaging test and one sponsorship.
Shorts from the strongest moments of long episodes and a short ruler episode (15–25 min) – one at a time, after the month's results.
New topic lineup
Each new episode's views on day 7: Asia topics vs the rest
Source: the YouTube counter, logged by hand
Packaging test
Watch-time share of variants in Test & Compare
Source: the creator's Studio
Sponsorship
Clicks on the dedicated link; ad retention once stats are connected
Source: link, advertiser
Get this audit for your channel
Paste your channel link – the AI builds an audit from public data. Connect stats to unlock CTR, retention, audience and revenue.
AppendicesTechnical checks, channel passport, brand readiness
Technical checks
Channel passport
Advertiser readiness
What to do in the next 30 days
The first growth hypothesis: bring the lineup back to Central Asia's rulers. The first monetization step: drop the crypto mixer from the first line and run one measurable sponsorship.
We'll help pick topics for the next episodes, set up a thumbnail test and put together an offer for advertisers. We start with one priority from your audit.
Sources: public YouTube data as of Nov 7, 2026 (channel page, 28 long episodes, 48 Shorts, about 640 comments on 4 episodes, captions of 5 episodes, YouTube niche search). YouTube Studio stats were not used. Money figures are estimates, not an income promise.
What people say about the channel audit
Now I know what to fix first
I finally figured out what to look at in analytics and what to fix first. After the consultation it became much clearer how to run the channel from here.
It wasn’t the editing
I thought the main problem was the editing, but the review raised more questions about my video topics and titles. The report used examples from my own channel to show where viewers lose interest. I’ve already acted on some of the recommendations and am rolling out the rest gradually.
Now there’s a plan
I was releasing videos regularly, but over time I stopped understanding why some got views while others were barely watched. That’s why I ordered the audit. The breakdown of specific videos was the most useful part: I could match the comments with the numbers and see exactly what needed to change. There were also a few interesting observations about competitors. The report is extensive – you won’t implement it all in one evening. During the consultation I cleared up the unclear points and decided which changes to start with. It’s too early to judge channel growth, but at least now I have a consistent plan.
Ordered an audit?
Tell us what the review did for your channel – we’ll publish your review on the site.
Write a review →Our services
Everything a creator needs to grow, monetize and work with brands.
Free tools: thumbnail tester · YouTube thumbnail downloader · YouTube thumbnail size · tag generator · keyword tool · YouTube video tags · influencer pricing calculator · sponsorship rate calculator · download your own video
Does your channel need an audit?
Ask an assistant – it opens with a ready question about the Bloggers.tools audit.